What is the Fair Pay Agreement?
The Fair Pay Agreement, or FPA, will introduce sector-wide collective bargaining for adult domiciliary care in England for the first time. An independent negotiating body, bringing together worker and employer representatives, will negotiate improvements to pay, hours and working conditions across the sector, rather than each provider setting these entirely independently.
That is the government’s framing, and whatever your view of it, the practical point for leadership teams is this: the FPA is designed as a floor for pay and conditions across the sector, not a ceiling. Providers will still be able to offer pay and conditions above whatever baseline is agreed. That matters, because it means the FPA does not remove the ability to compete on pay, it changes what the minimum competitive position looks like.
When will changes take place?
This is not an immediate change, but the timeline is now set out clearly enough to plan around, and providers who start budgeting and workforce planning against it now will be in a stronger position than those who wait.
- Autumn 2026: secondary legislation formally established
- Early 2027: an independent chair is appointed to lead the negotiating body
- April 2027: the first round of negotiations between worker and employer representatives begins
- April 2028: the first Fair Pay Agreement is due to take effect and apply to covered workers’ contracts
- 2028 to 2029: £500 million in government funding supports the first agreement
With roughly 18 months between now and the start of negotiations, and around two years before any agreement takes effect in contracts, leadership teams have a genuine window to prepare, both financially and structurally, rather than treating this as a 2028 problem.
It would be a mistake to treat the Fair Pay Agreement purely as a future cost line. Alongside it, the government has published part 3 of the Care Workforce Pathway, expanding the sector’s career structure with ten new role categories, including activity co-ordinator, care technologist, and several care-adjacent roles such as catering, domestic and maintenance staff.
For leadership teams, the Pathway and the FPA are best read together. The Pathway gives providers a structured, sector-wide way to define roles, skills and progression; the FPA gives that structure a formal mechanism for negotiating what it is worth. Providers who map their own job architecture against the expanded Pathway now will be far better placed to understand how a future agreement is likely to apply to their workforce, rather than trying to reverse-engineer it once terms are set.
What leadership teams should be doing now
Providers who engage early, both with workforce planning and with the sector representative bodies shaping the negotiating position, will have more influence over the outcome and less disruption when it lands. Practical steps worth starting now include:
- Model the financial impact of a sector-wide pay floor against current pay structures, including how far above that floor you would want to remain positioned
- Map existing job titles and structures against the expanded Care Workforce Pathway to understand where roles sit and how progression is defined
- Engage with employer representative bodies now, ahead of the 2027 negotiations, to help shape the priorities that go into the process
- Review recruitment and retention strategy in light of a sector that is moving toward more structure and more recognised career routes, since this changes what a competitive offer looks like
- Avoid quoting specific future pay figures to staff or candidates, since nothing will be confirmed until the 2027 negotiations conclude
What this means for competitive positioning in elderly care
For providers already paying above what any likely floor will be, this reform is less about cost pressure and more about the wider market repositioning around a clearer, sector-recognised career structure. For providers currently closer to the lower end of the market, the more useful question is not simply what the eventual floor will be, but how you differentiate once a baseline exists that every competitor has to meet. Pay will still matter, but progression, structure and reputation as an employer are likely to matter more once a wage floor narrows the gap between providers on pay alone.
If you are an employer thinking through what any of this means for your recruitment and workforce planning, whether that is preparing for a national pay floor, building a domestic training pipeline, or getting ahead of a changing ratings framework, get in touch with our elderly care team for a confidential conversation.
Looking for a new leadership role within elderly care?